tried-and-true
fuckyeahsexeducation:

thedailywhat:

Controversial Pool Policy of the Day: Breast cancer survivor Jodi Jaecks underwent a bilateral mastectomy in 2011. She opted not to have reconstructive surgery, and the procedure left her with two thin scars that cut across her chest where her nipples once lay.
Jaecks now suffers from a common side effect of mastectomies – nerve pain across her chest and neck:

It burns all the time — a pretty searing, intense pain.

As such, she has no interest in wearing post-mastectomy swimsuits, and besides, she really has nothing left to cover up. So she petitioned Seattle Parks and Recreation to allow her to swim topless in the district’s 10 public pools. (Video in link Sorta Not Safe For Work — Jaecks is pictured topless.)
But the district pushed back, telling Jaecks she wouldn’t be welcome unless she wore “gender-appropriate swimwear.”

“She made it clear she wanted to show her scars as a ‘badge of courage’ and wanted to use the pool to spread her message,” says parks spokeswoman Dewey Potter.

After the story broke Tuesday, Seattle Parks and Rec caved to public pressure and overturned the policy — but for Jaecks only.
Naturally, the meager concession prompted further backlash, and now it looks like Jaecks may win the battle and the war. The district has announced it will considerreversing its policy for everyone.
[theslog]

This is why gender rules are so messed up. It’s like this other thing I heard a while back where a post op trans woman was trying to get her state to change her ID to Female and they wouldn’t do it so she took off her top in protest saying they couldn’t arrest her because according to them she was a man. Seriously, where do you draw the line? What makes certain chests female? What makes female chests inappropriate?

fuckyeahsexeducation:

thedailywhat:

Controversial Pool Policy of the Day: Breast cancer survivor Jodi Jaecks underwent a bilateral mastectomy in 2011. She opted not to have reconstructive surgery, and the procedure left her with two thin scars that cut across her chest where her nipples once lay.

Jaecks now suffers from a common side effect of mastectomies – nerve pain across her chest and neck:

It burns all the time — a pretty searing, intense pain.

As such, she has no interest in wearing post-mastectomy swimsuits, and besides, she really has nothing left to cover up. So she petitioned Seattle Parks and Recreation to allow her to swim topless in the district’s 10 public pools. (Video in link Sorta Not Safe For Work — Jaecks is pictured topless.)

But the district pushed back, telling Jaecks she wouldn’t be welcome unless she wore “gender-appropriate swimwear.”

“She made it clear she wanted to show her scars as a ‘badge of courage’ and wanted to use the pool to spread her message,” says parks spokeswoman Dewey Potter.

After the story broke Tuesday, Seattle Parks and Rec caved to public pressure and overturned the policy — but for Jaecks only.

Naturally, the meager concession prompted further backlash, and now it looks like Jaecks may win the battle and the war. The district has announced it will considerreversing its policy for everyone.

[theslog]

This is why gender rules are so messed up. It’s like this other thing I heard a while back where a post op trans woman was trying to get her state to change her ID to Female and they wouldn’t do it so she took off her top in protest saying they couldn’t arrest her because according to them she was a man. Seriously, where do you draw the line? What makes certain chests female? What makes female chests inappropriate?

  1. shelbiannerosemary reblogged this from thecsph
  2. tingiling reblogged this from mllediabolique
  3. xx-rapunzel-xx reblogged this from thedailywhat and added:
    —————- From June 2012.
  4. beastandthecharlotte reblogged this from safespacenetwork
  5. finallyhopingtobecomehappy reblogged this from fuckyeahsexeducation
  6. melody-nelson reblogged this from fuckyeahsexpositivity
  7. ladyofthelog reblogged this from sophia-sol
  8. sophia-sol reblogged this from queenofthecretaceous
  9. spiritofgracekelly reblogged this from tipsybluetips
  10. beckyh2112 reblogged this from sentientcitizen
  11. sentientcitizen reblogged this from queenofthecretaceous
  12. onaroadlesstravelled reblogged this from fuckyeahsexpositivity
  13. fanoftentakil reblogged this from kepral
  14. queenofthecretaceous reblogged this from fuckyeahsexpositivity
  15. tech-no-lame-o reblogged this from kepral
  16. thundercnt reblogged this from fuckyeahsexpositivity
  17. wheresmywaterbuffalo reblogged this from squidward-stark-winchester
  18. jetage reblogged this from fuckyeahsexpositivity and added:
    I’m fine with people being required to wear certain clothing at certain places, but those requirements shouldn’t be...
  19. mildlyimpressive reblogged this from nearly-headless-ned
  20. gatica reblogged this from fuckyeahsexpositivity
  21. squidward-stark-winchester reblogged this from fuckyeahsexpositivity
  22. peacockzzz reblogged this from fuckyeahsexpositivity
  23. kepral reblogged this from fuckyeahsexpositivity
  24. fuckyeahsexpositivity reblogged this from fuckyeahsexeducation
  25. bettiemachete reblogged this from eventhebutchersdaughter
  26. eventhebutchersdaughter reblogged this from thedailywhat
  27. theshapeformerlyingrovepark reblogged this from strangersatthemall
  28. ohprimusthatlookspainful reblogged this from robohaven
  29. retrogradewaters reblogged this from fuckyeahsexeducation
  30. jenniferjungha reblogged this from allwayshallways
  31. professionalhomosexualist reblogged this from fuckyeahsexeducation
  32. sadtosmfah reblogged this from size10plz
  33. idontgetnosleep reblogged this from fuckyeahsexeducation
  34. gamingtimeladyfromgallifrey reblogged this from nerdymouse
  35. heyholden reblogged this from fuckyeahsexeducation
  36. tyraiko reblogged this from pricklylegs
  37. magicalsathers reblogged this from pricklylegs
  38. anachorite reblogged this from size10plz